Feb 232011

John Kerrane reports on the second Division 1 derby clash between our ‘A’ and ‘B’ teams.

“On Monday evening at the Trades Club, Holme Street, Hebden Bridge Chess Club’s B team faced their toughest challenge of the season when they played at home against their own A team, the current Calderdale League First Division leaders.

Realistically, if the B team could expect to beat the A team, there would be something wrong with the selection, but the result was closer than the scoreline, a 4-1 win to the A team, might suggest. All the games were close, and the two draws by Dave Shapland on board 2 against Matthew Parsons, and between John Kerrane and Matthew Wedge-Roberts on board 4, were well-deserved.”

The individual results were:

Hebden Bridge ‘B’ — Hebden Bridge ‘A’
P. Olley 0 — 1 D. Wedge
D. Shapland ½ – ½ M. Parsons
M. Syrett 0 — 1 A. Wright
J. Kerrane ½ -½ M. Wedge-Roberts
N. Bamford 0 — 1 N. Sykes
1 — 4
I plan to post the games in full with some more detailed commentary on Friday but in the meantime (it being half term and some of you having nothing better to do!) here are some interesting positions from the match. In each case I’ve set a little problem for readers to assess the situations themselves.
First up, here is the final position from Kerrane vs. Wedge-Roberts. A draw was agreed here with White to move. How would you assess the situation below? Should White continue playing for a win, is a draw the best he can hope for, or is Black better?
White (John Kerrane) to play
The next position is from Syrett vs. Wright. It’s White to play and he has managed to obtain a good positional advantage. What is the right continuation?
White (Martin Syrett) to play
Next, on board 1, Pete Olley and Dave Wedge reached the position below with Dave to play. How did he obtain a material advantage?
Black (Dave Wedge) to play
Here is an interesting position from the board 5 encounter between Neil Bamford and Nick Sykes. Black is winning but he must proceed with care owing to his pinned bishop. Nick considered both 1…Qb6 and also 1…Qe7. Which of these two moves is correct and why? Can you find anything better for Black?
Black (Nick Sykes) to play
Finally, from Shapland vs. Parsons. White has just played 20.Ne2 to which Matthew responded with 20…Qf6. He has a better move. What had both players overlooked?
Black (Matthew Parsons) to play
The answers and full moves for all these games will be revealed on Friday. Please feel free to add comments to this post if you think you know the answers. No prizes, just a bit of fun.

  4 Responses to “Derby double for the ‘A’s: Express Report”

  1. In Shapland-Parsons, black can play 1…Bb5! and win the exchange on e2. e.g. 2.Bd1 Nd3! with 3…Nxe1 to follow. Or, 2.Ba4 Bxe2 3.Rxe2 Nxe2+ 4.Qxe2 Re7 etc.

  2. In Bamford-Sykes 1…Qb3 looks best to me. Can't see anything better

  3. Yeah 1…Qb3 is good, however both 1…Qb6 and 1…Qe7 are both okay as well. As after 1…Qb6 2.Qg5 Black can play 2…h6 and he is fine!

    In fact Black lots of moves here and still be claely winning!

  4. Hey, have i gotten this right?
    In the Bamford/Sykes ..Qb3 is okay, ..Qb6 is okay, ..Qe7 is okay but so is ..Rd7 and so is ..h6 and and so is ..b5. I like ..Rc8 threatening a swindle! They're all winning.
    So the question is what was in the problem-setters mind?
    Guess it was a "board round the wrong way" slip-up {..Qe7 should be ..Qe2}. Now .. "which is wrong ..Qe2 or ..Qb6" answer "..Qe2 misses Rxd5 and will take a zillion moves to end in a draw by perp claely"

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>



This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.